Qui Procedis
\'Do\' clef is appearing in place of a custos on verse 10. The custos appears to be built in automatically to the coding. I am wondering if it is due to the \"teh\" being the first note on the next line. I\'m not sure that adding (i+) is the best fix given that it is a blatant marking that will show on external editors (please correct me if I am wrong).
Usage
- Sequentia
Sources
Download
Open with external tool
History
- Sep 04, 2023: Added to the database (JohnGreutman) ?
- Original transcriber: John Greutman
Liber antiphonarius, Solesmes, 1960, p. 176* ◀ ▶
Cantus selecti, Solesmes, 1957, p. 75* ◀ ▶